The Formation Quest

Essential Public Services within the Executive Branch
In brief, essential public services...
  would meet each citizen's needs through the acts of true public servants placed within the executive branch of public sector government. Yet all citizens first must institute a moral social contract among their kind in order to meet these needs which the logic from our humanly-common source morally prioritizes and explains. They must do so through a moral democracy within the language-analogous and sensible borders within which essential public servants custodially next would serve everyone's needs in first accord with everyone's individual "primary rights.
  It's then that all essential public servants, the expertized the primary public custodians among them, secondarily would contract politically with delegated authority. They'd purposefully contract to be the custodians of other humans while otherwise also exercising the primary rights by which they and all other humans socially could participate with equal standing within their publicly-private acts.
  Thus their socially-sanctioned access to political authority applies equally to include all the enfranchised by primary right while its exercise applies as a secondary right of social participation for those within both socio-political sectors. Those they'd serve fully retain the primary right of social participation and may hold them to account in their own moral defense, through moral civil disobedience if necessary. It's also then that they first must honor everyone's preeminent private rights to person and ownership of what's needed for personal viability because these primary rights  morally prioritize most highly even for the visiting non-citizen.
  Unlike their elected counterparts and those others among them having managerial and clerical expertise, only expertized public servants directly would serve the "man on the street" in the first of two possible ways. This applies to those who'd exist within standardized "official-to-citizen transactions" where and when  all individuals would be citizen's of a nation-state, their own domestically or an international other's. This includes some or all experts within banking and insurance, business and professional regulation, education, human services, law enforcement, legal Services, and ownership records domestically and migration and  trade internationally.
  Some directly also would serve the politically-unpurposeful who act through primary right within standardized "official-to-official transactions." That is, they'd knowingly share and charge with the custodial purpose morally to represent that constituency's rightfully-primary interests even while they'd politically apply their own expertises secondarily within their own and other moral interest groups to that purpose. This especially would include those within auditing and environmental affairs domestically and the foreign service and military defense internationally.
  All these experts as primary custodians would combine with the elected and other personnel managers and clerically-expertized "bureaucrats" who support them within their own moral interest groups. Within their own official-to-official transactions, all equally also would standardize to be "custodial managers." That is, none individually or as groups would rule as men within the moral social contract which first places political authority in the hands of those they all serve. Should a moral majority of those they'd
  Rather, they'd all serve the hierarchically-applied rule of moral law corporately within their own moral interest groups as they first would within their morally-exemplary nation-state. Only there and then could the expertises of essential public servants come into play while all participants morally would co-exist within their transactions.
  Given that, even elected bureaucrats must replace the primary public custodians- or quit- whether or not they have the expertise needed. It's then that personnel caps also would shift, both within the public sector as a whole and the executive branch itself where and when the executable rights of the people hierarchically first base on their needs socially to be applied by primary individual precedence from the more-authoritative "bottom" up.
  The disinterested standards from and of that language we  politically institute as governing "law" also would conform to effect this. Thus our essential public servants also could see that the analogous formations logically as word-formatives from our humanly-common source would prevail where and when, for instance, our hierarchical rights disinterestedly apply to prioritize the primary rights of the unenfranchised over those of the enfranchised so long as there'd ever and even be a moral social contract at all.
  The private sector also would lead economically to determine the taxation for and to which executive-branch essential public servants custodially could account within a moral banking system. It's then that tax money proportionally also would fund  our essential public servants' rights to share the public wealth equally. That it could through disinterested and logical standards which hierarchically also apply to other public-sector branches and the autonomous public sector as well but further makes the case for the practicability of our socially applying the moral alternative we've so far neglected as a species.

       Contents    Communication    Top    

Thanks for visiting The Formation Quest
Last modified on June 9, 1999